Our lawyer Ilse Salazar Andriotti published an article in issue 152 of the Revista de Estudos Tributários, edited by the Institute of Tax Studies in partnership with the publisher IOB.
Entitled “Aphorization and the change of meaning applied to STF precedents 269 and 271 in writs of mandamus”, the text talks about how normative statements can have their meaning changed when there is no analysis of the context in which the statement was produced. Concrete cases in which this occurred in the Law are analyzed, more specifically in relation to Precedents 269 and 271 of the Federal Supreme Court, on Writ of Mandamus.
